Period-Color Distance Estimation for Eclipsing Contact Binary CC Com

Sergey Postnikov

2006 June 2



Abstract

One night of photometric observations of a short period eclipsing binary CC Com was carried out with ST8 CCD camera mounted on 0.25 m Great Ohio Telescope. Overall 60 frames in V band and 5 frames in B band were taken during 6 hours, covering one period of the binary system. Reference stars in the fields are used to generate light-curve of a difference in magnitudes as a function of time. A period of 5.1±1.6 hr is found. Calculated color index of (B-V)=0.6 differs from known 1.2 due to the lack of standard stars in the field. Color-period-luminosity relation from Rucinski & Duerbeck 1997 paper is used to estimate distance to CC Com as 83±52 pc and compared to the known value 83±4 pc giving reasonable agreement.

1. Introduction

   A contact binary is a system of stars orbiting around each other where both companions fill, or even expand beyond, their Roche lobes, as defined in astrophysics text book by Carroll 1996. Basically, this is a common dumbbell-shaped atmosphere shared by two cores of the stars rotating around their center of mass. Therefore the separation distance between the stars is a good measure of the effective size of these type of binaries. Furthermore the separation distance is related to the period of the orbit by Kepler's third law. Gas in a common envelope being in hydrostatic equilibrium has temperature and density profiles (level surfaces) set by equipotential surfaces of the effective gravitational potential. This effective potential includes both the gravitational and centrifugal parts. Consequently color index (for example, (B-V) ) would be a measure of the effective temperature for the system. Using crude analogy with temperature-luminosity relation for stars, one would expect similar correlation between absolute magnitude and color index of a contact binary, but with one additional parameter - period. This is due to the combined "core" of the "star" having a double orbiting dynamical nature affecting the "radius" of the system.

   The previous heuristic arguments are the basis of papers written by Rucinski 1967 and revised later by Rucinski & Duerbeck 1997. "(It) ... is a purely geometrical relation, linking brightness with emitting area and surface brightness," he says in that article. Using the number of contact binaries with known parameters the author of the idea derives absolute-magnitude MV calibration of the form


where P[d] is a period in days, (B-V)0=(B-V)-E(B-V) is extinction corrected color. Figure 1 shows a plane in three-parameter (period-color-luminosity) space, which is set by this equation; data points are shown as black dots and used for calibration. An error for inferred magnitude can be estimated from rms deviation of the data from the plane. This came out to be 0.17 in magnitude. Random deviations of individual systems are expected due to the active nature of contact binaries, for instance, large star-spots and strong chromospheric activity.
Figure 1. The period-color-luminosity relation for contact binaries is shown as an inclined plane. The data of the systems used for the calibration are shown as dots. The rms deviation of the observed values of MV from the plane is 0.17 magnitude. The data are also projected into the horizontal period-color plane, where they exhibit the well known period-colour relation (discovered by Eggen 1961, 1967). Picture is taken from Rucinski & Duerbeck 1997.

   The significance of the above approach is in providing new means of estimating distances to stellar systems, especially where no other information (besides period, color and magnitude) is available. The way to do it is straightforward: once absolute-magnitude is calculated from measured color and period (which for eclipsing systems can be measured with high precision), it is used to estimate the distance to the object by a distance modulus formula


where d is a distance in parsecs, and V stands for relative visible magnitude measured.

   A target chosen for this project is the eclipsing binary CC Com. It has a short period of 5 h 18 min (appropriate for one night observation) and quite large amplitude of variation of visual magnitude (of the order of a unit, which is favorable for small-aperture telescopes in order to resolve variability) around in average value V=11.7 (parameters and light-curves were obtained by Rucinski 1976 and Hong-Nan Zhou 1987). Available for observations in April and relatively bright CC Com is a suitable object for photometric studying on the 0.25 m Great Ohio Telescope (GOT). But the main advantage is in relative photometry, since absolute magnitude value and particular details of the light-curve is not important for period determination.

   Rucinski & Whelan 1977 in their spectroscopic study of CC Com found the distance to the object to be 83±4 pc. This distance is comparable to the distance to the cluster Comae Berenices (Melotte 111) which is 89.9±2.1 pc (Casewell 2005), but membership is probably ruled out by proper motion study of Klemola 1977. The main purpose of this work is to estimate distance to CC Com by period-color approach (as discussed above) and compare with known value listed.   

2. Observations

   CC Com was observed with the ST8 CCD camera installed on GOT during the night on April 28th, 2006 (UT). Overall 6 hours were covered and both V and B filters used: 16 frames in V band with exposure time of 70 s, 5 frames in B band with exposure time of 230 s, 41 frames again in V band but with exposure time of 120 s, and three last frames in V band with longer exposure time of 230 s. Temperature of the detector was set to -17°C.

   Observational procedure was the following: just right after sunset 3 flat-fields were taken in B filter and 5 flat-fields in V filter, then during set up of pointing model 9 zero-frames were taken followed by making 3 dark-frames of 70 s, 3 dark-frames of 120 s and 1 dark-frame of 230 s. Next, using finding chart shown on Figure 2, field was set as shown by solid-line rectangular getting bright star '4' on guider chip (solid-line square). Started at 2:27:52 UT (air-mass at that moment was 1.060) 10 frames in V band were exposed for 70 s each. Later, between 3:04:53 UT and 3:33:47 UT since the target reached the highest altitudes (for the sake of taking advantage of low air-mass values of the order of 1.04) 5 frames in B band were taken with 230 s exposure time. And after, 6 more 70 s frames are taken again in V band. The flip of the telescope was performed around 3:55 UT changing the orientation and position of field as shown on Figure 2 by dashed-line, now bright star '1' used for guiding. Also during the flip procedure 2 dark-frames of 230 s were taken. Since the camera was in new position after the flip there were dimmer stars in the field (Figure 2, 'a' and '3' are out of the field) and therefore next 41 frames had longer exposure time of 120 s taken in the same V band. Some clouds noted on the west in the evening and higher air-mass values (> 2.1) made stars fainter and the last 3 exposures in V band had 230 s exposure time. For these reasons around 8:10 UT the object was lost and could be no longer observed. But using the dark time left 4 dark-frames of 230 s, 3 dark-frames of 120 s, 6 dark-frames of 70 s and 5 zero-frames were taken. Finally, 4 flat-fields in V and 3 flat-fields in B were made in the morning.   
Figure 2. This is 1x1 degree finding chart with labeled stars (see Table 1) and the target (CC Com) shown by an arrow. Rectangular area is field of view of CCD camera and square region is a guider chip. Solid line refers to the camera position before the flip, and dashed line refers to the camera position after the flip. Picture is generated by The STScI Digitized Sky Survey in quick-V filter.

  
Table 1. Table of properties of the stars which are labeled on the finding chart, Figure 2.

   Conditions during the observational night were quite good as sky was clear and seeing had about 3 arcsec value. Only some clouds were seen on the west and they covered the whole sky in the morning. The Moon disappeared (moon phase was equal to 2) below horizon long before observation of the target. Weak wind was present but didn't affect the data. It was also dry enough during whole night so there was no problem of dew on the correcting lens. Consequently one period of the eclipsing binary was covered with overall 65 frames of fair data.   

3. Reductions

   IRAF software is a suitable tool for this project to carry out basic reductions. Firstly, inspected by eye and task imstat zero-frames were combined into the one zero-frame. Secondly, inspected the same way dark-frames were combined together into one dark-frame. At this point all of the zeros and darks passed the inspection, no frames were excluded. Flat-fields were examined next and found to be satisfactory. Combined zero- and dark-frames were used to correct flat-fields and object-frames. Resulting flats were combined into the one flat-field. Finally, division of object-frames by combined flat-field yielded data for photometric studies. Reduced images were checked by eye and for the purpose of this work were found reasonable, even without cosmic rays removed.

   Task phot were used to find instrumental magnitudes of the stars and to estimate their errors. Each frame was examined by task imexam to find FWHM of PSF of star images (had values from 7 to 12 pixels) and standard deviation of the sky were estimated by imstat applied for rectangular patch of empty sky in the field (varied from 10 to 25 counts per pixel). These two parameters are needed for photometry in task phot. Additionally, size of the sky annulus and aperture size for flux were varied to get converging magnitude, because of avoiding cosmic ray pixels and not crossing an edge of the field (typical values used are 30 pixels for aperture, 30 for inner annulus radius and 3 for width of the sky annulus). Each frame must be evaluated individually with unique parameters for the visually identified star in order to get a trustable data point.   

4. Results

   A table of results with instrumental magnitudes and their errors for each bright labeled star was generated. UT at the middle of exposure is used as moment of time for corresponding magnitude value and half of the exposure time is estimation of time error. Some of the stars turned out to be very dim and were ignored. The brightest ones had better statistics and were used for relative photometry. For frames before the flip of the telescope instrumental magnitude of the target is subtracted from instrumental magnitude of the star 'a', for frames after the flip instrumental magnitude of the target is subtracted from instrumental magnitude of the star 'gamma'. Since the comparison star for the second half is different, data were adjusted by shifting the whole set by a fixed value in order to align maximum regions of light-curve. It is explained on Figure 3, data points at both maxima fitted by a linear function and difference of free coefficients is taken as a shift. The calculated result is 1.46 with statistical error of 0.03.
Figure 3.Calculation of the shift of magnitude difference after the flip with respect to the one before the flip. Data points are chosen around both maxima, and then fitted with linear trend. The shift is calculated as difference between free coefficients yielding value of 1.46±0.03.

   Data obtained in B band still can be used to fill in the gap in light-curve, which is constructed in V filter. The idea is the following: data for elapsed time between 0 to 1.4 hr are interpolated by polynomials of 4th for V and 2nd for B order as it is shown on Figure 4. Average difference between the functions gives difference of instrumental color index (b-v)=-0.4±0.1. And it is used to add points to the V band light-curve.
Figure 4. Difference of instrumental color index (b-v)=-0.4±0.1 is found from average difference between fitted polynomials in the time gap between 0.5 and 1 hr.

   After all adjustments the resulting light-curve is shown on Figure 5. It has a shape characteristic for eclipsing binary systems, schematic view of which is shown on Figure 6. Error bars get bigger as higher values of air-mass were reached and clouds covered the field of view. At the end statistics got very poor and the object was finally lost. This part of the light-curve has large error bars and data points are significantly scattered.
Figure 5. Light curve as difference of magnitudes between target and comparison star. The flip performed at the first minimum. Before the flip comparison star is 'a', and after the flip it is 'gamma'. Violet dots are the b band values but adjusted to v by shift equal to color index b-v=-0.4±0.1.

   Nightfall is available for free software which models contact eclipsing binary stars from known light-curve. Considering poor quality (no details resolved, large error bars, insufficient amount of data for good statistics ) of the obtained light-curve in this project, the parameters from Ricinski & Whelan 1977 are used to construct CC Com geometry shown on Figure 6.
Figure 6. Geometry of the eclipsing system CC Com modeled by software Nightfall.

   To find the period of the eclipsing system from light-curve in the model independent fashion the two eclipses are fitted with parabolas (the reasonable curve for local minimum) and distance between their vertices are said to be half of the period. It is shown on Figure 7. The period found this way is equal to 5.1±1.6 hr. Briefly explaining, the fitting of the form of A x2 + B x + C for the first eclipse gives the coefficients A=1.28±0.16 , B=-4.45±0.58; for the second eclipse it gives the coefficients A=1.94±0.23 , B=-16.6±2.0. Whence the positions of the vertices of the parabolas -B/(2 A) are 1.74±0.32 hr and 4.28±0.74 hr. Therefore after propagation of the errors the uncertainty in the period is 1.6 hr.
Figure 4. Period determination by minima positioning of both eclipses with fitted parabolas, resulting in 5.1±1.6 hr

   The color determination turned out to be the most difficult part of the project. In order to find it the transformation from instrumental magnitudes to standard ones must be known. It was done with one standard star 'a' available in the filed and transformation equation of the form,


where lower case refers to instrumental magnitudes, upper case for standard magnitudes, six coefficients "c" are the ones to solve for. Task fitparams solves the transformation equations using as input parameters known instrumental and observed magnitudes. Additionally to the star 'a', known V magnitude for the star '3' was also used in the procedure above. Outcome for the standard color of CC Com found this way is (B-V)=0.6. Which is very different from the one given by Rucinski 1976, (B-V)=1.2. The problem here is that one star with known color is not enough to reconstruct the transformations. It can be easily seen the following way: substracting transformation equations for two stars the expression can be obtained

   Left hand side of the expression is the difference for instrumental color index (for example, -0.4, which was found for the target comparing to the star 'a' ), the right hand side is composed of the difference for standard color index multiplied by transformation coefficient k. Therefore in order to find the standard color for the target one more star with known color has to be known, since it is the only way to calculate unknown value of k. The values of c2 and c5 obtained by task fitparams are meaningless since they strongly depend on initial seed values imposed (this is simply the case of lack of constraints). Due to the fact just discussed (B-V) color value 0.6 is ignored and 1.27±0.05 (Rucinski 1976) is used for distance estimation.

   Absolute magnitude MV=7.1±1.3 of CC Com is calculated from period 5.1±1.6 hr and color index (B-V)0=1.27±0.05 (see calibration equation in the introduction). Extinction along this line of sight is as small as 0.013 (Casewell 2006) and was ignored. The errors are propagated using the formula

.

   Finally, the distance modulus formula yields a value of 83±52 pc for distance d to the eclipsing contact binary CC Com based on period and color measurements. The distance uncertainty is calculated by the following expression for propagation of errors

.

  

5. Discussion

   Considering large errors of the measurements and many adjustments made for the light-curve the answer 83±52 pc for distance in a good agreement with 83±4 pc given by Rucinski & Whelan 1977. It supports the period-color-luminosity relation for contact binary systems. Furthermore CC Com can be added to the existing calibration list of contact binaries and used in refining the calibration equation for absolute magnitude. Noticeably enormous uncertainty in the distance is due to the poor statistics and quality of the light-curve, especially in the eclipsing regions. These greatly affect the error in the period especially inferred by minima positioning technique used.

   The thousands of contact binary systems were discovered ever since. Mostly it was done in systematic searches of the sky for stellar variability and during the galactic cluster searches. Utilizing ones with known distances from their parallaxes new calibration for luminosity-period-color was calculated and applied to the rest to estimate their distances. In the recent catalog (Gettel et al 2006) 1022 bright contact binary stars were used to calculate their space density. It was found to be uniform up to a distance of 300 pc and has a value of (1.7±0.6) 10-5 bright contact binary systems per cubic parsec. Summarizing, the luminosity-period-color method so far has proved itself to be very powerful and it is waiting when new data on contact binaries with known distances become available to significantly refine the correlation equation.

   Improvements to be made if one decides to repeat this project are the following: (1) observe the object in March on photometric night to cover period within smallest values of air-mass (2) lack of standard stars should be treated with additional photometric night observing photometric standard stars for calibration purposes (3) make longer exposures to improve signal to noise ratio that will reduce the error bars (4) switch between the filters while taking the data to avoid large gaps in light-curve.   

References

Bradley W. Carroll, Dale A. Ostile, 1996, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics
Casewell S., Jameson R., 2006, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 365:447-453
Gettel S. J., Geske M. T., McKay T. A., 2006, AJ, 131:621-632
Hong-Nan Zhou, 1988, Astrophysics and Space Science, 141:199-206
Klemola A. R., 1977,Pub. A.S.P., 89, 402
Rucinski S., 2004, New Astronomy Reviews, 48:703-709
Rucinski S., 1976, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 88:777-787
Rucinski S., Duerbeck H., 1997, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 109:1340-1350
Rucinski S., Whelan J., 1977, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 89:684-687
Yulan Yang, Qingyao Liu, 2003, Pub. Astr. Soc. Pacific, 115:748-754